From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 04:32:48 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760FE16A420 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2B213C48E for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2789952waf for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:32:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sgqi9f1t/4UZPzUvujUaiCt08Pbv/+KqSQpYRWnrZsI=; b=VMZN2jYoAYic71WDA2fn/bvSBZbmxX1WfGg4Yn33K2JGc1aR00dM7ixKX2j4pSGQGQlYc8dbOU39pMi9Vd9zhbo2sK+EcBgwlxJ98IoKKjA5g8hxzEl4sKII/R/FuIyvLtaOwJ0Q0Lkz2qJu3mAxknZ1pZF0vi1T+tgWQTHOa6I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=T+0dd4zMWkA2MM5WkGjKX50EEOE6AO8ufBnvfKU3q/vkv0ffxVUev4hq97MCK1dPkhOhKRZ//tOjB9aQayCmhB/s5fi76tGlg/3R2xdO+W/0BgCAIapsuL/nrcytjgcP8WpoRlPf9oYat0Op4vlqkv5uOr04oifmYEDLfhWL69w= Received: by 10.114.195.19 with SMTP id s19mr286109waf.1195619568017; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 35sm5382521wra.2007.11.20.20.32.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:32:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id lAL4V4Y2014739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:31:04 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id lAL4V3Bb014738; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:31:03 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:31:03 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" Message-ID: <20071121043103.GC13817@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <474288AE.1040106@gmail.com> <20071120083135.GB9777@cdnetworks.co.kr> <4742A318.9020803@gmail.com> <4743AC94.6070605@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4743AC94.6070605@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: who do I report this to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:32:48 -0000 On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:57:08PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:11:42AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman > >> wrote: > > > > > >>> Who do I report the following issue to (it falls into at least > >>> 3 camps)? > >>> > >>> If I am downloading a torrent in deluge 0.5.6.2_1 *AND* am > >>> logged into gmail (*WITH* a chat open) my network connection > >>> looses about 90% of it's capacity (for all applications), re(4) > >>> with the following: > >>> > >>> rgephy0: PHY 1 on > >>> miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, > >>> 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto > >>> > >>> After some experimenting this problem *only* occurs under the > >>> above conditions. > >>> > >>> Addtional info: > >>> > >>> gnome 2.20.1 nv driver (latest) Xorg 7.3 > >>> > >> Would you show me more details(network configuration)? Since > >> re(4) is involved here I'd like to know what caused the issue. If > >> you disable checksum offload does it get better > >> performance?(#ifconfig re0 -txcsum) > > I am going to reboot to see if this clears but I noticed this You don't need to reboot at all after chainging checksum offload configuration. Does re(4) spit some messages like watchdog timeout? If not I have no clue yet. > happening also: > > monster# !! > cvsup -h cvsup10.us.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile > Connected to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org > Updating collection src-all/cvs > Edit src/lib/libc/rpc/key_prot_xdr.c,v > Edit src/lib/libc/rpc/rpc_callmsg.c,v > Edit src/lib/libc/rpc/rpc_prot.c,v > Edit src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcb_prot.c,v > Edit src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcb_st_xdr.c,v > Edit src/lib/libdisk/libdisk.h,v > Edit src/lib/libgssapi/Makefile,v > Edit src/lib/libkse/Makefile,v > TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed Sorry, I don't know Modular3 language, so I don't know what socket operation was failed. If remote end closed the connection it wouldn't be fault of re(4). You can check it with tcpdump. > Will retry at 23:00:29 -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon