From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 13 20:36:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0717316A4CE; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:36:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 730AC43D3F; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:36:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6DKXc6r053157;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:33:38 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:33:42 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20040713.143342.17590193.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <24670.1089750588@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <20040713.142011.51857482.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<24670.1089750588@critter.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: scottl@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: nate@root.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/kldunload kldunload.8 kldunload.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:36:55 -0000

In message: <24670.1089750588@critter.freebsd.dk>
            "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
: >Too many years of having weird, odd-ball attachments maybe?  That's
: >why newbus was created: to have a unified heirarchy to make it easier
: >to write drivers.
: 
: Right, we call that Second Systems Syndrome over here :-)

Baseless namecalling won't accomplish anything.

: >Frankly, I dislike your obstructionist attitudes towards newbus.
: 
: Obstructionist ?  That's a pretty harsh word for somebody who has
: wasted a couple of months trying to write a newbus-ified GEOM.

It just seems that whenever the topic of newbus comes up, you don't
want to use it.

Warner