Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 23:17:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 224029] sysutils/py-salt: builds for python 3.6??? Message-ID: <bug-224029-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224029 Bug ID: 224029 Summary: sysutils/py-salt: builds for python 3.6??? Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: ports@thelanman.net CC: christer.edwards@gmail.com CC: christer.edwards@gmail.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(christer.edwards@gmail.com) So, I noticed that py-salt is marked as broken for Python 3.4 - 3.6 . However, this only appears to be because of the 2 reference to .pyc and .pyo files in the pkg-plist Python 2.7 stores the bytecode and optimized files with the .py file while Python 3+ seems to use a __pycache__ folder.=20 If I remove the lines: %%PYTHON_SITELIBDIR%%/salt/_syspaths.pyc %%PYTHON_SITELIBDIR%%/salt/_syspaths.pyo from pkg-plist it seems to work just fine. I haven't installed it yet, but = it builds. So, I guess the question is..is there a reason the .pyc and .pyo are specif= ied in the pkg-plist? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-224029-13>