Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:51:00 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Axel S. Gruner" <axel.gruner@suedfactoring.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with INDEX Message-ID: <20041123175100.GA80073@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041123084531.GD95566@pcs28.suedfactoring.de> References: <20041123084531.GD95566@pcs28.suedfactoring.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:45:31AM +0100, Axel S. Gruner wrote: > Hi. >=20 > I ran into some problems with "portsdb -uU" since the INDEX file has > been removed from the CVS. > Sometimes it works, sometimes not.=20 > In my understanding, after a cvsup of the ports tree, i have to do a > "make fetchindex". Works fine. But what about a "portsd -uU"? Is this > one obsolet (but portupgrade needs the INDEX.db?)? >=20 > So the only INDEX file i have is "INDEX" if i run "portsdb -uU" i get en > Error 1. If i run just "portversion -v" after a cvsup, i get a "Updating > the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.." after a while > also an error 1.=20 >=20 > So, is this just a problem "at the moment", or does it depends on the > removal of "INDEX" from the CVS tree?=20 /usr/ports/UPDATING Kris --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBo3iEWry0BWjoQKURAggqAJwOFqaFHrufG6NPkCpqmSA8aPwVBQCgswQa LaLZJsnleAC1e9QFmaG13dU= =Domf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041123175100.GA80073>