Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:03:13 +0100
From:      des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, harti@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, stable@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Message-ID:  <86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:51:34 -0700 (MST)")
References:  <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more
> > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive
> > coverage analysis.
> Then it should be the default, standard flag.

I wish.  Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which
systematically opposes this kind of change.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86irruao3i.fsf>