Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:20:28 +0100 From: Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@freebsd.org> To: Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r366064 - head/sbin/fsck_msdosfs Message-ID: <6FE32F41-C178-49DE-820B-07B37B748B0E@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <202009230652.08N6qNsa070062@repo.freebsd.org> References: <202009230652.08N6qNsa070062@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Sep 2020, at 07:52, Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
> --- head/sbin/fsck_msdosfs/dir.c Wed Sep 23 04:09:02 2020 (r366063)
> +++ head/sbin/fsck_msdosfs/dir.c Wed Sep 23 06:52:22 2020 (r366064)
> @@ -388,7 +388,8 @@ static int
> checksize(struct fat_descriptor *fat, u_char *p, struct dosDirEntry *dir)
> {
> int ret = FSOK;
> - size_t physicalSize;
> + size_t chainsize;
> + u_int64_t physicalSize;
Is there a reason for using the non-standard u_int64_t rather than uint64_t?
Jess
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6FE32F41-C178-49DE-820B-07B37B748B0E>