From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 4 04:03:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA18380 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 04:03:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail12.digital.com (mail12.digital.com [192.208.46.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA18368 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 04:02:55 -0800 (PST) From: garyj@frt.dec.com Received: from cssmuc.frt.dec.com by mail12.digital.com (8.7.5/UNX 1.5/1.0/WV) id GAA05602; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 06:59:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost by cssmuc.frt.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Nov95-0232PM) id AA19086; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 12:58:51 +0100 Message-Id: <9703041158.AA19086@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message from Pedro Giffuni of Mon, 03 Mar 97 12:16:54 PST. Reply-To: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com Subject: Re: What ever happened to ...BISON ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 04 Mar 97 12:58:51 +0100 X-Mts: smtp Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co writes: > Hi, > BISON was part of the 2.1.5 tree (developers), but I don't see it > referenced in the web pages. Was it included in the base distribution, > it broke or what happened ? > > Pedro. bisdn was never in the tree in any shape. What was there was based on ii.0.1, bisdn is based on ii0.2. The isdn support was also never a port; it was under /sys/gnu and /usr/src/gnu. IIRC bisdn was included as an experimental package with 2.1.5. This version is now outdated. At the moment there's no isdn support in the FreeBSD release. Just to clarify things :) --- Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de (play) gj@freebsd.org