From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 13 16:00:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C9915B5BCF for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259578B309 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D9F6915B5BCE; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C4E15B5BCD for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E43ED8B2ED for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from lrrr.mouf.net (cpe-174-109-174-192.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.174.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id x5DG0aSe079605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:42 GMT (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mouf.net; s=mail; t=1560441646; bh=fVGw3HwuU8RmmiFUlXU4QcXQeacYtakwWdErPcwJaE0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=tBA+zahXqPehhh0mK18qY+4V32Gyyq4rw+RSR3rVlmhb19ufiTM0w03boW7w+9fN1 q8lMbHnJ2VZiRB7Eoyj12NwpSK7B/yyHp/1fzuR3VuTiEc6z/8vUrPiLsipB3oIZEO iEoT1Buk0AZQ3DANOI0wlD/4K9+0gsnAEDsOw5Sc= Subject: Re: How to best check a configuration of another port/package? To: Adam Weinberger , Mel Pilgrim Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Gerald Pfeifer References: <736af897-818e-68cd-c354-f295d03fb176@bluerosetech.com> From: Steve Wills Message-ID: <40631880-8ec7-03b9-5fde-2e7b15ff5c51@mouf.net> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:00:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E43ED8B2ED X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=mouf.net header.s=mail header.b=tBA+zahX X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.48 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.958,0]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[192.174.109.174.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[mouf.net:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[mouf.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[mouf.net:-]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.mouf.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.715,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:fc50::/36, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.70)[ip: (-9.17), ipnet: 2607:fc50::/36(-0.39), asn: 36236(-3.88), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:55 -0000 Hi, On 6/9/19 11:48 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > No, you're absolutely right. Flavours is the right way to do it now. I > keep forgetting about them, because I don't in any way understand how > to use them. Hmm, flavors have to be something that can be installed in parallel, right? How does that impact binutils? The approach I would have taken would have been to make the static option in binutils also install an empty file in DATADIR and have GCC check that file. Maybe that isn't ideal. Steve