Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:10:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Wes Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adding drive to raidz1 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906182009040.43653@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet> In-Reply-To: <m2ws79590u.wl%randy@psg.com> References: <m2bpol6v8r.wl%randy@psg.com> <4A3ABF76.3020905@modulus.org> <cf9b1ee00906181540w746edafi4a560b0925b14e27@mail.gmail.com> <m28wjp6tp2.wl%randy@psg.com> <4A3AC5B2.9010607@modulus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906181941130.10212@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet> <m2ws79590u.wl%randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Randy Bush wrote: >> The only way to "fix" this is just what everyone has said... Back up the >> data, destroy the pool and recreate. > > done. worked. luckily this was a system in build. > >> When you do this, if you don't want to be using slices > > i have nothing against slices > >> zpool create raidz somethingbesidestankfortheloveofgod ad4 ad5 ad6 ad7 > > she really does not care about the pool name. :) > >> And you'll be set. But you're using ad5s3 and ad6s3, are the first two >> slices in use? > > on the two bootables > s1 is a small gmirroed boot > s2 is a non-mirrored swap > s3 is pool Just out of sheer curiosity, are all the slices and devices in the raidz the same size?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0906182009040.43653>