Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:42:00 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 212681] I/O is slow for FreeBSD DOMu on XenServer
Message-ID:  <bug-212681-23905-Mplo2PMfC2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-212681-23905@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-212681-23905@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212681

--- Comment #37 from Roger Pau Monn=C3=83=C2=A9 <royger@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Roger Pau Monn=C3=83=C2=A9 from comment #33)
So I've run the dc3dd test on a FreeBSD VM, with 4 vCPUs and 4GB of RAM,
against a block device on a spinning disk, nothing fancy, and this is what I
get:

(FreeBSD guest) # dc3dd wipe=3D/dev/ada1

dc3dd 7.2.641 started at 2017-02-10 16:19:54 +0000
compiled options:
command line: dc3dd wipe=3D/dev/ada1
device size: 20971520 sectors (probed),   10,737,418,240 bytes
sector size: 512 bytes (probed)
 10737418240 bytes ( 10 G ) copied ( 100% ),  125 s, 82 M/s

input results for pattern `00':
   20971520 sectors in

output results for device `/dev/ada1':
   20971520 sectors out

dc3dd completed at 2017-02-10 16:21:58 +0000

Then I shut down the guest, and ran the same test from Dom0 (Debian Linux 3=
.16)
against the same exact block device, and this is what I get:

(Linux Dom0) # dc3dd wipe=3D/dev/dt51-vg/test

dc3dd 7.2.641 started at 2017-02-10 16:31:34 +0000
compiled options:
command line: dc3dd wipe=3D/dev/dt51-vg/test
device size: 20971520 sectors (probed),   10,737,418,240 bytes
sector size: 512 bytes (probed)
 10737418240 bytes ( 10 G ) copied ( 100% ),  114 s, 90 M/s

input results for pattern `00':
   20971520 sectors in

output results for device `/dev/dt51-vg/test':
   20971520 sectors out

dc3dd completed at 2017-02-10 16:33:28 +0000

So there's a < 10M/s difference, which I think it's fine (at the end there's
always some overhead).

I cannot really explain the results that you get, but I cannot also reprodu=
ce
your entire setup here. This is using the 12.0-CURRENT snapshot from 201702=
03.
I'm afraid that unless we find a way for me to reproduce this, there's no w=
ay
that I can try to fix it.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-212681-23905-Mplo2PMfC2>