From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 21 22:00:56 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA22411 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 21 Mar 1995 22:00:56 -0800 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA22404 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 1995 22:00:46 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id WAA11997; Tue, 21 Mar 1995 22:00:29 -0800 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 1995 22:00:29 -0800 Message-Id: <199503220600.WAA11997@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: chaos@rivers.oscs.montana.edu CC: Ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (message from Jason Boerner on Tue, 21 Mar 1995 22:27:45 -0700 (MST)) Subject: Re: Xpaint port... From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Ok. First off... Thank you to everyone who has helped this FreeBSD * newbee get off the gound!!! You're welcome! (Well I didn't help you but I always say "you're welcome" to thankers! :) * After fixing a few syntax errors in the source code (How do I re-submit * these to the port so that it works for the next person?) I get too the You can send mail to ports@freebsd.org (as you did) and tell us where we can find your corrections. Preferably in a context diff format that we can put under the patches/ subdirectory, but anything is fine. However, as far as I can tell, xpaint has compiled correctly on our box without any problems. Can you try to re-ftp it from ftp.freebsd.org and try again? * ld: -lXpm: no match * ld.so: xpaint: libXpm.so.3.4: Undefined error: 0 * * Am I correct? How do I fix it? You are correct, and all you need to do is to get the xpm port/package and install it. :) It's in ports/graphics (you can see that in your xpaint toplevel Makefile -- under the variable LIB_DEPENDS). By the way, you may want to follow the instructions that show up when you "cd ports" on ftp.freebsd.org. If you had gotten the new bsd.port.mk file, "make" would have done this for you (assuming you already have ftp'd the xpm port, of course). If you want to play with X, getting the whole ports/graphics subtree now is not a bad idea, 'cause many utilities need something under it and the new port scheme will automatically make them as required. Satoshi