From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 15:49:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E191106567E for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231558FC18 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:49:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=c0ewRXWGMVTuGBJ57gKXt1sCyfUnVVuPP7SvuGfA9uM=; b=O6cLM4W4v3CdHw5fBYxKl/tCc4JzQx2J2Xu2Wb1b46maWuzxuykHuIVI3yagVxQwvRelqXSUsRHHVrqo5SXixonJ2t4fHQmVtQX/d49ZcfRXjDQFPfuchrHZPaBHFFHl; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Shjd0-000219-Bt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:49:03 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1340293736-94480-94479/5/29; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:48:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:48:56 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:49:04 -0000 On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:42:55 -0500, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > And it is truly funny for me to know people do think this way. > If you understood how ZFS commits data to disk you'd not be making these statements. Also, if you take snapshots you can just roll back if there is any weirdness at all. Another important point: With 24 ZFS mirrors you'd have your data being striped across ALL the mirrors. This will yield much better performance.