From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 9 06:47:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDEF16A4CE; Sun, 9 May 2004 06:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6528A43D2F; Sun, 9 May 2004 06:47:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i49DlapW013036; Sun, 9 May 2004 09:47:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 09:47:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Julian Elischer cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_resource.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 13:47:43 -0000 On Sat, 8 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > yes, but the posix priority stuff all affects the entire process > so we are diverging from that. Right, my only point is that it is OK to diverge from that since rtprio() is not part of the standard and any application that uses it should not expect POSIX conformance WRT process priority and scheduling. -- Dan Eischen