From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 24 08:36:26 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFFA16503A for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:36:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tj@enoti.me) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46zLF524qCz4jFq for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tj@enoti.me) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499C6210A8; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:36:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:36:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=hI2tdw cy7j+hk7U7GwgmVlrfnzH1us55exO4PUFEYTE=; b=vxoPyojcp8czpZX1dYXOgB hfNDiyNpaseTvq0jmflJY8mkQMFaH0N4aFS515/RS5hyZbZV8U5OuYaNjPN7WxHP IBwrRbkNh6skuqkvNIhO20oslB9xarwL3HTXZzbU2PuRKyWKOqG+QoIdxOFl1G/R WzIcHiHcVz1b2Q4klDtV1l4gJAAT2qbi/sxeMI0Zhz7CpMsNwRjc6vhB6SeLL5+2 SwwBdUFyh4HvchGd9FUKMXAtx2EGvS5RCH5rfiSoqH2aUJoGgAghdwRYtYj6fXlw ecliQ76x00dHBCYo3QxvrGsMRd4axXduiA9OFCZbS370S8o6p7UOkpBARs/jfNmw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrledugddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefvohhmucfl ohhnvghsuceothhjsegvnhhothhirdhmvgeqnecukfhppedufeejrdehtddrudejrdduvd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhjsegvnhhothhirdhmvgenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from tom-desk.erg.abdn.ac.uk (tom-desk.erg.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.17.12]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9212680061; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:36:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 09:36:23 +0100 From: Tom Jones To: vm finance Cc: freebsd-net Subject: Re: TCP Congestion Control Message-ID: <20191024083623.GA7222@tom-desk.erg.abdn.ac.uk> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46zLF524qCz4jFq X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=vxoPyojc; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tj@enoti.me designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tj@enoti.me X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.09 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.27]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[enoti.me]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-3.49)[ip: (-9.83), ipnet: 66.111.4.0/24(-4.87), asn: 11403(-2.68), country: US(-0.05)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[27.4.111.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:36:26 -0000 On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:29:50PM -0700, vm finance wrote: > Ok - I see there is a socket option to pick a different cc per-socket > basis. > Any experiences on loading / using different cc per socket...does it work > seamlessly? I have not heard of any problems and have happily done recently: $ iperf3 -c host -C cubic - [tj]