From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 9 12: 9:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from extremis.demon.co.uk (extremis.demon.co.uk [194.222.242.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0621114F84 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 12:09:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gjvc@extremis.demon.co.uk) Received: (qmail 67067 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Jan 2000 20:08:50 -0000 Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 20:08:50 +0000 From: George Cox To: "James A. Mutter" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can 1 machine do Squid and NAT? Message-ID: <20000109200850.C66882@extremis.demon.co.uk> References: <3878CC3D.6D63D4D5@commercialmovers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.1i In-Reply-To: <3878CC3D.6D63D4D5@commercialmovers.com>; from jmutter@commercialmovers.com on Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 12:58:22PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT (i386) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 09/01 12:58, James A. Mutter wrote: > I'm building a machine to do NAT for our small corporate network and I'd > like this machine to run Squid as well. Is this possible? Yes, certainly. > With NAT can I specify that packets bound for 3128 from the inside network > go only to Squid and are not to be NAT'ed? Hrm. The packets from the inside network will be bound for internal interface of the NAT box, for reception by squid, and so won't get forwarded. > (Although the machine is still in it's early stages and could easily be > converted to 3.4 if that would be helpful) It's generally a good plan to follow the latest version of the -STABLE branch if you can. Find out about 'cvsup'. best; gjvc -- [gjvc] 4.4BSD 4.ever! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message