From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 27 05:22:31 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8571F589;
 Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:22:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F1B5E06;
 Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:22:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b6so11168496lbj.11;
 Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:22:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=KNZXOT/St4qZagbNNgrGIex6F3mOnlXw8ET0tpAgPXk=;
 b=yhBdmMA1QGnb+3REtx72YGybYA8cG0GbISsk8gUOnV/kavwEM7LXrR5MgD07kqgtWH
 6z+4DtEjTRqhxjArXKenYbHlfx6E1ME7K7IX+kKRotApCZFhjU9xDtKgZFShMGuPsRuP
 Z4xYtoxFfah1YynHlYU+IFeT5xwNdVFrHrmaz3FvylGiHVnyO9v6xNyiEVltJbqvH4D4
 wrgM7n27a1jEo0upluFLaLHcmTlY7bO+ofTtdw6vMTJVQoRLmPQsmOnBQ35evYTZMxt7
 Y0d2zzFyVm2xO2X0hMLzWnE+QxUuKKVI56TElBfX8/XrqdWbZsgojc5l+bKVVThY8SZp
 At/w==
X-Received: by 10.152.161.168 with SMTP id xt8mr1931331lab.35.1422336148896;
 Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:22:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.12.6 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:21:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Yue Chen <ycyc321@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:21:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKtBrB4NJw-0ydw2KPq+xkjNm4N51e9zkV2Htq3P5cdUj5Jw1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Will all kernel functions be loaded into memory, in the same address
 space with kernel modules?
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:22:31 -0000

My purpose is to modify kernel function instructions directly through
memory at runtime.

First I use "objdump -S kernel" to see the function names and their
addresses. And then I use pointers to peek into the content at certain
function address area (.text segment). However, their content is different
from the result from "objdump -S kernel". I use a FreeBSD 10.1 kernel,
which has no ASLR supported as I know.

Is it because that the kernel function addresses are relocated? Or some
kernel functions are not loaded into memory? Or is it not suitable to peek
kernel ".text" content from a kernel module?

I only "objdump -S" the built "kernel" with debug symbols, not ".ko" files.