From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 4 11:51:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950F516A41F for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:51:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E6F43D64 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:51:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5D07C.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.208.124]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k04BlR69091728; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:47:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k04BpM8N037732; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:51:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:51:21 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Chris Message-ID: <20060104125121.701cc504@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0601011728j31f1cd5as@mail.gmail.com> References: <43B7BBEE.5020701@roq.com> <3aaaa3a0601011728j31f1cd5as@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Michael Vince , freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, huang leo Subject: Re: Benchmark MySQL Performance On FreeBSD And Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:51:25 -0000 On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 01:28:07 +0000 Chris wrote: > have had mysql lockups until I tinkered with the threading settings. Libthr > is the good old threading routine from the 4.x days if I am correct, so if > libpthread is indeed unstable under continous heavy load how has it become > unoticed by the developer's or has it just been tested in desktop > environments? libc_r is the threading library used in 4.x. libpthread and libthr are SMP aware threading libraries with a different internal structure (M:N vs. 1:1). Bye, Alexander. -- 0 and 1. Now what could be so hard about that? http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 WL http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/registry/1FZ4DTHQE9PQ8/ref=wl_em_to/