From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org  Sat Nov  7 08:03:00 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61087A2841D;
 Sat,  7 Nov 2015 08:03:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rdivacky@vlakno.cz)
Received: from vlakno.cz (mail.vlakno.cz [91.217.96.224])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245181FE9;
 Sat,  7 Nov 2015 08:02:59 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rdivacky@vlakno.cz)
Received: by vlakno.cz (Postfix, from userid 1002)
 id 6579E1E209B1; Sat,  7 Nov 2015 09:00:45 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=vlakno.cz; s=mail;
 t=1446883245; bh=+vEw5YX6ADCL8o1dYKaNXeTt3uLE65jAUU37VuTbNKQ=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
 b=A9h7g8fTkSPSiImJHO8O5vu7AfZ7nGCD0oDuQ/C5L71MuU71KRcOwCuyqaWqDFE2U
 xNXDagMT7Itzm0jSwcXUuM2Bv09GtB8ITsYZFfWHLg7XYa1wgOVVTS1gJ+6PC4QD70
 RxYH1Z5AsZuA6chKo7+p1jG9Ue84F8aFEWxfvW04=
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:00:45 +0100
From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@vlakno.cz>
To: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
Cc: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>, alexmcwhirter@triadic.us,
 freebsd-sparc64 <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about
 Sparc64
Message-ID: <20151107080045.GA4586@vlakno.cz>
References: <563A5893.1030607@freebsd.org>
 <20151104214451.GF47630@server.rulingia.com>
 <CAJ-VmokSfg_iuNP-MBT9VxHoxVbhGEkWtN6Oiy_ezbmhVMeteg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151105232431.GE31432@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
 <CAJ-Vmo=kQgQMH5Fgrpgp6GZtAg4w-0tvAbeCEa+weq8eu9pSsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <6189d48d3a178c4ebf501361c75de23f@triadic.us>
 <563CB6FC.209@freebsd.org> <20151106203527.GH65715@funkthat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151106203527.GH65715@funkthat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 08:03:00 -0000

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:35:27PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Sean Bruno wrote this message on Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 06:19 -0800:
> > problem 1.  the base clang/llvm doesn't support the FreeBSD sparc64
> > target.  This needs work, and hey, if someone wants to spend the time
> > to get things working, great.  Let's move on it and modernize the target.
> 
> We've had support for sparc64 in base clang/llvm for close to a year..
> The problem isn't clang, the problem is making our kernel sources work
> with it...

LLVM still lacks some (many?) things needed to compile FreeBSD kernel.
If nothing else, at least this patch
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20141215/248852.html)
is needed. There's also different frame size and probably some other issues.

Roman