From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 26 09:59:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA09990 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 09:59:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (omega.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA09950 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 09:59:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@parc.xerox.com) Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <40754(2)>; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 09:58:43 PDT Received: by crevenia.parc.xerox.com id <177515>; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 09:58:36 -0700 From: Bill Fenner To: fenner@parc.xerox.com, njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk Subject: Re: Apparent bug in sendto() with raw sockets Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@whistle.com, nate@almond.elite.net Message-Id: <98Jun26.095836pdt.177515@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 09:58:27 PDT Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >I'm not so sure [compatability is] so important in this case. As I said before, I'm worried about externally-written programs, particularly about externally-written programs that are not distributed with source (like pathchar). I'd also like to see a definitive way to tell which order the kernel is expecting, so that externally-written programs that want to be portable (like, for example, mrouted, mrinfo, mtrace, rsvpd, etc.) don't have to use __FreeBSD_version. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message