From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jul 12 10:35:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.Go2France.com (ms1.meiway.com [212.73.210.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7BD37C039 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lconrad@Go2France.com) Received: from sv.Go2France.com [212.73.210.79] by mail.Go2France.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.03) id AC573014028C; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 19:35:19 +0200 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000712192913.052a9bb0@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: lconrad%Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 19:33:44 +0200 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: Len Conrad Subject: Re: IPsec Performance (Re: Merge of KAME code) In-Reply-To: <20000713022715E.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000711174522.03075a20@mail.Go2France.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > TCP STREAM TEST UDP STREAM TEST > NONE: 60Mbps NONE: 94Mbps > AH: 23Mbps AH: 30Mbps > ESP: 11Mbps ESP: 11Mbps > AH+ESP: 8Mbps AH+ESP: 9Mbps At those limits, the process was CPU bound, or protocol-turnaround bound, or what? That's for one tunnel, but is there significant additional overhead in running 10's or 100's of tunnels or sessions? for the one-server-to-many-clients situation. Thanks, Len Len http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com: ISC BIND 8 installable binary for NT4 http://IMGate.MEIway.com: Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message