From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 7 15:48:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2C016A4CE; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:48:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C360843D5A; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:48:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.250]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i57Fm8tv009525; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i57Fm8MC066971; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i57Fm8XG066970; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:48:08 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20040607154808.GA66937@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <40C36D31.4010003@freebsd.org> <20040606193510.GA95886@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <40C37F3C.1050602@freebsd.org> <20040606211249.GC96607@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <40C390C4.1000609@freebsd.org> <40C48BA8.6090005@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40C48BA8.6090005@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: HEADS UP! KSE needs more attention X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:48:12 -0000 On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:37:12AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > One thing to note is that whatever platforms get dropped from tier-1 > status will have a high probablility of not getting updated with the > upcoming binutils/gcc/gdb update that is coming. Logic dictates that the probability should be 0. One cannot reach tier 1 from any tier >1 if binutils, gcc and gdb are not working. Hence, any tier 2 platform must already be supported by binutils, gcc and gdb. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net