From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 02:41:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8054B16A419 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403FD13C447 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB30D8B0D4 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:41:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:41:22 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: j4CbwF/LMax3fObQf55FdvET04xwzrpVU3neErvb/E2W 1200624082 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF35E1B1 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:41:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <479011D1.2020502@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:41:21 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070928) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20080117190011.GA1094@medusa.sysfault.org> <20080117195348.GA67081@hoeg.nl> <20080117212510.GB1094@medusa.sysfault.org> In-Reply-To: <20080117212510.GB1094@medusa.sysfault.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: BSD cflow available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:41:23 -0000 Marcus von Appen wrote: > As cflow - in my opinion - is a useful tool to get a better overview > about the control flow in (possibly unknown) source code, being "better > safe than sorry" would be the best way to go here, I think. > Nice. I downloaded and tried the code. It's good to see that it uses BSD make, so it builds quickly, and should just drop right into the src/ tree, which is your intention. I'm glad you've done this, as ticking POSIX boxes is always good for the project's credibility. However, I prefer using something like kscope or gonzui for large projects. cheers BMS