From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 30 06:19:05 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8637C37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 30 Mar 2003 06:19:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E9D43FBD
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 30 Mar 2003 06:19:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fearow@attbi.com)
Received: from god.woofcat.com (12-251-110-17.client.attbi.com[12.251.110.17])
          by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with SMTP
          id <2003033014190300300k3hgqe>; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:19:04 +0000
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 08:18:31 -0600
From: Anti <fearow@attbi.com>
To: des@ofug.org,
	?=@FreeBSD.ORG (Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav)
Message-Id: <20030330081831.5c4e317e.fearow@attbi.com>
In-Reply-To: <xzpk7ehhxaf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
References: <20030330125138.K23911@leelou.in.tern>
	<xzpk7ehhxaf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Organization: Woofcat
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: l.ertl@univie.ac.at
Subject: Re: vinum performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:19:08 -0000

On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:08:24 +0200
des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote:

> Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at> writes:
> > Anyone has an idea what's going wrong here? (Apart from me doing bullsh=
*t
> > benchmarking :-) .)
>=20
> Just out of curiosity, try again with prime stripe sizes (31, 61, 127,
> 257, 509) or at least odd ones (31, 63, 127, 255, 511).


try benchmarking ccd as well to see how it compares? and try some big stripe
sizes (4093, 8191, 12281)?