From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 18:29:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394E116A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:29:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.tsgincorporated.com (ns2.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F050743D39 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:29:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.tsgincorporated.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6CF28DE37; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:29:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtp2.tsgincorporated.com ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 87929-06; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:29:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtp3.tsgincorporated.com (support.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.9]) by smtp2.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF48128DE33; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:29:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) by smtp3.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0066162896; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:29:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <02fe01c4bb89$c70d5570$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: References: <1a5.29af5401.2eafe426@aol.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:29:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by AV Subsystem at smtp2.tsgincorporated.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious investigations into UNIX and Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:29:54 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: TM4525@aol.com To: micheal@tsgincorporated.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 12:32 PM Subject: Re: Serious investigations into UNIX and Windows In a message dated 10/26/04 12:24:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, micheal@tsgincorporated.com writes: > If you think that administering a Windows server is so simple then > answer the following test: > > How do you lock down an Exchange 5.5 server to prevent a spammer from > using it as a relay. > So who was the one who said either was "easy"? I said it takes a higher talent level to generally administer a un*x box than a windows box. I don't think that just because you can think of something thats not easy to do in windows makes any point at all. The fact that a un*x guy had to be called in to solve the problem says alot about the type of talent that is required to do most things that windows techs do. ------------- I agree with you. However, it wasn't I that posed that question. :) -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.