From nobody Mon Jun 5 12:01:27 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QZXJb50Lsz4ZpYy; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martymac@freebsd.org) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QZXJZ6YM6z3K8M; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martymac@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F328AC000D; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:01:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Ganael Laplanche To: Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen , Nuno Teixeira Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: f05f6dcedb5d - main - comms/gqrx: Turn off ASLR Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 14:01:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4032264.p4y8TspHLy@home.martymac.org> In-Reply-To: References: <202306051020.355AKv8s099426@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <2a6fe201-399e-b086-0bc1-d882505b0e90@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4QZXJZ6YM6z3K8M X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29169, ipnet:2001:4b98::/32, country:FR] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Monday, June 5, 2023 1:20:05 PM CEST Nuno Teixeira wrote: Hello Nuno, > Really nice! I will test it asap. Great! Just a note about proccontrol(1) vs elfctl(1) : proccontrol(1) will control process execution at run time while elfctl(1) will modify the binary header itself, allowing the option to be persistent (and kept when distributed in a package). Best regards, -- Ganael LAPLANCHE http://www.martymac.org | http://contribs.martymac.org FreeBSD: martymac , http://www.FreeBSD.org