Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:00:08 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> To: Antony Mawer <fbsd-arch@mawer.org> Cc: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>, delphij@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH FOR REVIEW] kqueue'ify inetd(8) and several other cleanups Message-ID: <a78074950511112200t1848c89do1447ede094c8d18c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43753142.7060002@mawer.org> References: <a78074950511091943v5cc5c701p5b977630c84d35a8@mail.gmail.com> <20051110172650.Q48388@mp2.macomnet.net> <20051110204849.GC775@funkthat.com> <20051111140424.GB733@empiric.icir.org> <43753142.7060002@mawer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/12/05, Antony Mawer <fbsd-arch@mawer.org> wrote: > On 12/11/2005 1:04 AM, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > While on the topic of inetd and deviating from the other BSDs, I noticed > when playing with pf that OpenBSD has the ability to bind services to > specific interfaces in the inetd.conf file. Is there any interest in > bringing this capability across to the FreeBSD inetd? > > I noticed the OpenBSD PR database suggests this came from NetBSD: Yes, that was in my TODO list, too. Personally I'd prefer OpenBSD's version, however, the change is not just to import their changes, as we already did many changes against inetd(8), which made simple re-import impractical. Cheers, -- Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a78074950511112200t1848c89do1447ede094c8d18c>