From owner-svn-doc-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 3 00:30:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B705415; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw14.york.ac.uk (mail-gw14.york.ac.uk [144.32.129.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21810C26; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk ([144.32.64.162]:62395) by mail-gw14.york.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Xvxpe-0006Kc-BN; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:30:14 +0000 Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:30:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Gavin Atkinson X-X-Sender: gavin@ury.york.ac.uk To: Jason Helfman Subject: Re: svn commit: r46041 - head/share/xml In-Reply-To: <201412012314.sB1NEjnS019333@svn.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201412012314.sB1NEjnS019333@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the doc tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:30:22 -0000 On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Jason Helfman wrote: > Author: jgh > Date: Mon Dec 1 23:14:44 2014 > New Revision: 46041 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/46041 > > Log: > - fix submitting bug report links > > PR: 195539 > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1250 > Reported by: mi@ALDAN.algebra.com Hmm, I think I agree with the navibar.ent change, but not the header.ent change - this was actually deliberate. See r45385. Pointing people to the information page rather than the "submit a bug" page directly was intended to be much more user-friendly than the Bugzilla "you must log in or register" to do this page, which is a pretty awful introduction to reporting a bug. Instead, they were taken to a page which encoraged them to search the PR database first, provided guidance for how to submit a good bug report, explained why registering/logging in was necessary, etc. I think I'd rather see the header.ent URL change reverted (though the "Bug-report" -> "Bug Report" change is a good one). Thanks, Gavin > > Modified: > head/share/xml/header.ent > head/share/xml/navibar.ent > > Modified: head/share/xml/header.ent > ============================================================================== > --- head/share/xml/header.ent Mon Dec 1 19:56:49 2014 (r46040) > +++ head/share/xml/header.ent Mon Dec 1 23:14:44 2014 (r46041) > @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ >
  • Vendors
    • >
  • Security Information
    • >
  • Bug Reports
    • > -
  • Submit Bug-report
    • > +
  • Submit Bug Report
    • > > > > > Modified: head/share/xml/navibar.ent > ============================================================================== > --- head/share/xml/navibar.ent Mon Dec 1 19:56:49 2014 (r46040) > +++ head/share/xml/navibar.ent Mon Dec 1 23:14:44 2014 (r46041) > @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ > >
  • Bug Reports >
    • >
  • Web Resources
    • > > >