From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 09:33:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4254B9C6; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7163::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00498B88; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1B16F4DE2; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:33:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:33:15 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: Martin Wilke Subject: Re: svn commit: r347857 - head/mail/thunderbird-dictionaries Message-ID: <20140311093314.GF89162@droso.dk> References: <201403110640.s2B6eMDI022100@svn.freebsd.org> <20140311090000.GB78846@FreeBSD.org> <20140311091706.GA13255@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 9.1-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org" , Alexey Dokuchaev , Antoine Brodin , "svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org" , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:33:17 -0000 Let's stop this thread right here right now and both of you, step away from the keyboard for a bit. I don't want to see a single email from either of you for at least one hour. Both of you have a good point, it's a good idea to group similar commits to reduce churn, espcially on the email list, Martin is also right that everybody has their process and it should always be fun(1) to work on the project. Personally, I'd rather see a thousand small similar commit messages that I can easily delete, than read through this thread. But in the end, it's such a minor issue and we have such bigger problems to work at, so go out, have a beer/tea/water and come back to read MOTD on freefall: "Now, shut up and code. Really." Erwin 1: for varying defitions of fun which differ from person to person, from day to day. On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 05:23:31PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: > Look, everyone have his own work flow. When someone is trying to fix a port > then he should do it as he wish not as you wish. I think there is nothing > wrong with. Yes I am angry because you may not feel it but you are > seriously demotivating peoples to work on ports. Because you have always > point to your own opinion and that doesn't matter if it style or minor > mistakes and this is not right. You should please remember that everyone > contribute in his own free time. > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 05:03:51PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: > > > bohr you cant stop right? > > > > Which part of my email you disagree with? You don't think that several > > tens of trivial, identical one-line changes better be grouped together? > > Or you are happy with one-word commit log that tells nothing about what > > exactly is being fixed? Was is the tone of my email that you find rude > > or disturbing? Anything else? > > > > No, seriously: you get angry about this one email of mine, but are not > > being annoyed by unnecessary lists spamming due to suboptimal usage of > > SVN we have here every now and then. I just don't get it, man. > > > > ./danfe > > -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.dk erwin@FreeBSD.org http:// www.FreeBSD.org