From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 23 01:27:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D897716A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:27:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6587443D2D for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:27:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CWPTF-0004HQ-00; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 02:27:53 +0100 Received: from [217.83.10.145] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CWPTF-00061b-00; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 02:27:53 +0100 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 02:28:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <1101172253.28304.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1101172253.28304.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1832909.IXUJUikOm9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411230228.21316.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Subject: Re: pf on FreeBSD 4,5,6,etc ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:27:55 -0000 --nextPart1832909.IXUJUikOm9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 23 November 2004 02:10, R. Tyler Ballance wrote: > Howdy there, > > I'm slightly curious about running packet filter on FreeBSD > 4.10-RELEASE. > > Now, before I get flamed about just upgrading to 5.3-STABLE, let me just > say that, that won't be happening until the uniprocessor performance > improves (but that's another can 'o' beans) > > Anyways, I'm developing an application for my university (Texas A&M), > and I can support packet filter on NetBSD-current, and OpenBSD 3.5,6, > but I'm a bigger fan of FreeBSD, not to mention, the university runs > it's main firewalls on Drawbridge (http://drawbridge.tamu.edu) on > FreeBSD 4.xx-STABLE. > > It'd be much easier to convince them to switch the internal bridges from > slackware to FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE than FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE ;) > > Can it be done, or am I barking up the wrong tree? There is pf in KAME and it should be able to get it out of the KAME snapsho= ts.=20 I, myself, don't use 4.x and rather work on improving 5/6 ... It can be done. KAME should be a good starting point. I'd be happy to see=20 it. ... BUT I won't do it. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1832909.IXUJUikOm9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBopI1XyyEoT62BG0RAl2nAJ9Ioz4ryJxiJjdQz1nVrZzOGvhwmgCfWltu S+f3U9t59ti/xEdFCYLZj+A= =XscA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1832909.IXUJUikOm9--