From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 18 09:15:09 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id B35FB1065672; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:15:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:15:09 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Message-ID: <20120718091509.GA53570@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201207172057.q6HKvEJc094784@svn.freebsd.org>
	<5005DB51.7050809@dougbarton.us> <5005E5C4.2030809@freebsd.org>
	<20120717230739.GA66332@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
	<5005F1E3.7080606@dougbarton.us>
	<20120717234412.GA69885@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
	<5005FDBD.5000407@dougbarton.us>
	<20120718001944.GA71608@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
	<500676B1.30403@dougbarton.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <500676B1.30403@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>,
	Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r301039 - head/archivers/zlib
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:15:09 -0000

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 01:41:21AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 17:19, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > Those two lines above are not only list of distinfo files with absent
> > EOL at the last line, but also an example of real parser which broken
> > by such distinfo.
> 
> So again, what I'm asking for are the *details* of what was broken, and
> how.
> 
> And FWIW, since that was my *first* question, you could have started off
> with this answer instead of engaging in pointless theoretical discussion.

Come on, guys, let's just fix the damn bug and be done with it.  I totally
understand how minor this issue is, yet how annoying in the same time (if we
forget about very strict parsers).

./danfe