From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:57:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F4F16A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485A543D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:57:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4A8vQx63345; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:57:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:57:26 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:57:28 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [mailto:chad@shire.net] >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:31 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > >Wow, Ted a top-poster! Why not, no point making everyone reread the entire argument all over again, I'm sure most people on the list have seen it an enormous number of times already. > >A professional evaluation of "beastie" showed he was not a logo and >had served as a poor-one at that in his ersatz role as a wanna-be >logo. (Note that I did not say that Beastie was poor but that he >had served as a poor logo based on professional criteria of what >makes a good logo). So, we traded in Beastie, a difficult and expensive to print logo that lost most resolution when shrunk down, for a difficult and expensive to print logo that loses most resolution when shrunk down. Ah, this is progress. Kind of like the automobile companies do, when they replace last years difficult and expensive to service model because everything is jammed into a too small engine bay, with this years difficult and expensive to service model because everything is jammed into a too small engine bay. I got it now! Ted