From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 24 17:54:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from morpheus.skynet.be (morpheus.skynet.be [195.238.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA6B37B708; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:54:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [194.78.234.186] (dialup1722.brussels.skynet.be [194.78.234.186]) by morpheus.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B60DB70; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 02:54:06 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 02:52:00 +0100 To: Kris Kennaway From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Optimisation patch Cc: Bruce Evans , current@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 5:14 PM -0800 2000/3/24, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Err, this thread started with a patch to do that, which is what we're > currently discussing. Understood. I just didn't want to lose sight of the real goal of the proposed patch, and what led up to the proposed patch. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message