Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:08:00 +0100 From: Tim Bishop <tim@bishnet.net> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting gitolite Message-ID: <20110711130800.GA8467@carrick-users.bishnet.net> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-KkwTRHmEn990kvvn3XPObGJAapeSoDoNtPGfF6M4aXg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110709112937.GA4859@carrick-users.bishnet.net> <4E18EAD2.1030700@douglasthrift.net> <CADLo83-KkwTRHmEn990kvvn3XPObGJAapeSoDoNtPGfF6M4aXg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:50:27AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> > > % grep git /usr/ports/{UIDs,GIDs}
> > > /usr/ports/UIDs:git:*:211:211::0:0:gitosis user:/usr/local/git:/bin/sh
> > > /usr/ports/GIDs:git:*:211:
> > >
> > > The only thing that might need changing is the gecos field in the
> > > UIDs file, maybe to something like "gitosis/gitolite user".
>
> Personally I wouldn't bother changing the gecos though.
You don't think it's confusing having the gecos field refer to a
different port? I can imagine a case where somebody might remove it
because they're not using gitosis.
Maybe a more generic name would be better? Although I think "git user"
is likely misleading too.
Tim.
--
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110711130800.GA8467>