From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 6 14:34:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA13516 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 14:32:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA13509 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 14:32:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dag-erli@ifi.uio.no) Received: from hrotti.ifi.uio.no (2602@hrotti.ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.15]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id XAA20634; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 23:32:18 +0100 (MET) Received: (from dag-erli@localhost) by hrotti.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 23:32:17 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: John Fieber , "David E. Cross" , Eivind Eklund , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The infamous dying daemons bug References: <2826.910378788@time.cdrom.com> Organization: University of Oslo, Department of Informatics X-url: http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~dag-erli/ X-other-addresses: 'finger dag-erli@ifi.uio.no' for a list X-disclaimer-1: The views expressed in this article are mine alone, and do X-disclaimer-2: not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or X-disclaimer-3: company with which I am or have been affiliated. X-Stop-Spam: http://www.cauce.org/ From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Date: 06 Nov 1998 23:32:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Fri, 06 Nov 1998 10:59:48 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id OAA13512 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: > > If it was happening to everyone as much as it was happening to > > me, I seriously doubt 3.0 would have ever reached release > > status...having inetd die every 6 to 24 hours, httpd and sendmail > > every couple days is pretty intolerable. > Have you tried that new inetd.c replacement that was posted awhile > back? I'm just wondering if it affects the problem. David's looked > at this one a bit and he can neither reproduce it nor come up with any > good ideas right now as to how to go about fixing it. It only addresses the "junk pointerm, too low to make sense" bug, not the "dying daemons" bug which John is complaining about. ISTR we identified that as a VM bug. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message