From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 18:20:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F42E79 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B7D3D8 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r13IK0x2008014 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:20:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r13IK0tX008010; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:20:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:20:00 GMT Message-Id: <201302031820.r13IK0tX008010@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Subject: Re: ports/175738: maintainer update: mail/dovecot2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Raphael Kubo da Costa List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:20:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/175738; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Raphael Kubo da Costa To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Attila Nagy Subject: Re: ports/175738: maintainer update: mail/dovecot2 Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 20:17:15 +0200 Any reason to bump PORTREVISION to 3 instead of 2 in dovecot2-pidgeonhole?