From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 02:30:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6FC16A4CE; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:30:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns0.secureanonymous.com (tjhawkins.com [64.232.254.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B03E43D49; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:30:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timh@tjhawkins.com) Received: from cdm-66-76-83-77.fayt.cox-internet.com ([66.76.83.77] helo=yourw92p4bhlzg) by ns0.secureanonymous.com with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C8qY8-0006dN-40; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:31:32 -0500 Message-ID: <010e01c49df0$a5b79400$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> From: To: "Chris Laverdure" References: <010801c49dee$72cc5eb0$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> <1095546154.671.6.camel@elemental.DashEvil> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:30:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns0.secureanonymous.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tjhawkins.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please explain. X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:30:38 -0000 Your taking it the wrong way, I was simply asking a question to the developers to confirm this. I have standardized on FreeBSD. I apologized if I made it seem like I was trolling, not my intention. If a business were to standardize on FreeBSD, they would love to know if the multithreading issues would be fixed completely correctly not just 'work-arounds'. sorry and thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Laverdure" To: Cc: ; ; Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:22 PM Subject: Re: Please explain. > On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 02:14, timh@tjhawkins.com wrote: > > Ask the FreeBSD developers, any of them with honesty should tell you or > > proof me false. I dare you to proof this false, I would be so happy if you > > did. Just because I'm using MS Mailer does not reflect whom I am. I have > > only 1 MS workstation with 9 others unix. > > > > I expected a mature response from most of you, calling names is NOT the way > > to resolve problems. I just want an answer to see if this is true. > > > > **Is it true**? This is what I've noticed myself and many high-scale > > developers. > > > > Thank you > > 1) The burden of proof is on the person making the allegations. > > 2) Calling a troll on being a troll is mature. > > 3) If you believe it to be true, then don't use FreeBSD. Nobody is tying > your hands here. You believe DragonFlyBSD to be superior? Then use it. > > Maybe I just don't see the big deal here, but the developers owe you > nothing. > > >