Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:17:46 +0900 (JST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: ports-committers@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r331810 - in head: Mk/Uses archivers/lha archivers/lha-ac audio/mp3gain comms/vrflash converters/mpack emulators/vmw german/dtaus graphics/hobbes-icons-xpm irc/iroffer irc/iroffer-dinoe... Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1311260414350.1711@tuna.site> In-Reply-To: <526E39C2.2000806@FreeBSD.org> References: <201310272229.r9RMTkd2060648@svn.freebsd.org> <526E39C2.2000806@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Bryan Drewery wrote: > portmgr has decided that manpages should be in the plist; you > should not unilaterally decide to re-add a macro for it again. One question on this that's been in my head for a while: Should we ever move man pages from .gz to .xz, say, how will we go about this in ports? To me that is the main design disadvantage of moving from MAN= to pkg-plist. I am sure this has been considered and I just have not seen the answer. Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1311260414350.1711>