From owner-freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Tue Sep 27 07:24:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4D9BEB22A for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BAA5BC for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:1c1d:86a1:a200:b700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93F1B10DF for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/93F1B10DF; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: p5-DateTime 1.39 broken To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org References: <20160927093502.234b9afdc4bba1c5cd22a65c@vivatek.com.au> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <7493c607-db96-79a5-fe45-e57c8f853c2f@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:24:39 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160927093502.234b9afdc4bba1c5cd22a65c@vivatek.com.au> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dxeQwAFHqXxcoNlrfEtXJWqgvW2KNN1x5" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:24:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --dxeQwAFHqXxcoNlrfEtXJWqgvW2KNN1x5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nkcPFShepCQ4L7sepJXsSU3u5ixPt2Atv"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Message-ID: <7493c607-db96-79a5-fe45-e57c8f853c2f@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: p5-DateTime 1.39 broken References: <20160927093502.234b9afdc4bba1c5cd22a65c@vivatek.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20160927093502.234b9afdc4bba1c5cd22a65c@vivatek.com.au> --nkcPFShepCQ4L7sepJXsSU3u5ixPt2Atv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/09/2016 00:35, Gary Newcombe wrote: > Looks like devel/p5-DateTime builds but is failing with the following > at runtime. >=20 > Can't locate Params/ValidationCompiler.pm in @INC (you may need to inst= all the Params::ValidationCompiler module) (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib= /perl5/site_perl/mach/5.20 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/= perl5/5.20/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.20 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/= 5.20 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.20/mach .) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/= site_perl/DateTime/TimeZone/OffsetOnly.pm line 12, line 1. >=20 > The author, Dave Rolsky, says of Params/ValidationCompiler: >=20 > "This is very alpha. The module name could change. Everything could > change. You have been warned." >=20 > So why he's using it in DateTime-1.39 who knows. >=20 > Just in case you hadn't noticed given the popularity of p5-DateTime. > This broke a lot of scripts for me. p5-DateTime was reverted to an earlier version that doesn't require Params/ValidationCompiler. Update your ports and try again please. I have a port of p5-Params-ValidationCompiler almost ready to go into the tree -- the warning about the code being 'very alpha' notwithstanding, if the authors of important modules like DateTime think it's suitable to use, I can't see any reason not to at least have it available for everyone to test for themselves. Cheers, Matthew --nkcPFShepCQ4L7sepJXsSU3u5ixPt2Atv-- --dxeQwAFHqXxcoNlrfEtXJWqgvW2KNN1x5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJX6h6/XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATYLAQAJvWMx8nVUugVFm+2pfUM8lb RC2pTWkzMhQzka+v7T5gPhm+fLvM2eI+uvWkDpYUzBudKqcrk9OEHVyrHVWme5wG HKBJZ3eb40bd8H26sA7Dwf8aZNIFUyJXe2rEVK8GjPszoIIeZApHlBJUsdCKv6nd jdVztJewW+ijE7iklcOdb+I9OMF1tN6JQzPnJuSGeO4fyPOAgpXoStUMUVQ5C44W nx+gk6OcOpxlEUENTJEQCCfqhFEkc54aJhqE1TtgQ+nTPxbu6VFLWFFXckdM3FXx 2RCp7PN0mgYsgaAhaon82FuVIl92COx0dOB8xlh0lxYuJ2Mbi0xQNDEUlOcpbqjD j2tJNmxivBbtnfVAsjR93hMRqOnAHl55yUn7/NvK6bvdArVpPZZJTP8BwTPzD1dl ZB2XkIBTxAvbEBd6Jy74uq0QrcTFU5d9ujvPdYRY9jdumflET6YvI+bpif9KeUub iSYAwS6BhVXQEtvcEJaK9nHimy9mZHnuAlUJLgN3RgZ+FFHwctv65d3S5k92Gesl fk7/jEVUnqftDw1JV9fj/LEZv/N9OcsTU3+NrIpA09Vsa2d7oOu5PI65xw9jsrL/ 0Qi0IZz2oGo947aztW8qOGgt25U/FubbMYgDQmOy6YE8dssV4KT2W/20A5+g4uN4 sQwWa50TtmFi9VuojtGY =XLkD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dxeQwAFHqXxcoNlrfEtXJWqgvW2KNN1x5--