From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 15:35:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7227516A403 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B5913C480 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165751C81D3; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:11:35 +0200 (EET) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:39:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <45F61FEE.1030800@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <45F61FEE.1030800@nokia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703131739.06657.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: David Cecil Subject: Re: fsck, soft-updates, and snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:35:59 -0000 On Tuesday 13 March 2007 05:52, David Cecil wrote: > Can anyone tell me src/sys/ufs/ffs/README.softupdates and > README.snapshots are up to date? The former is dated June 2000, so it's > almost 7 years old. The snapshots readme is only 2 years younger and > mentions the code being alpha-test. > I can answer indirectly. sysinstall, the default FreeBSD installer, enables soft-updates by default on every filesystem, except the root filesystem. I think this is true since the 4.x days. This must make them pretty well tested. I do not the exact status of snapshots. Perhaps you should ask freebsd-fs. I know some problems regarding snapshots are now resolved. > The problems I'm seeing in 6.1 are: > 1. After writing a lot if data/files to a filesystem with soft-updates > enabled, then unmounting or remounting it: > update error: /: blocks files > It appears others have seen this too. It appears that an attempt to > flush the buffers to disk as part of the unmount failed. Is this a > known issue? > Could you describe how to reproduce the error? That would be really useful. HTH, Nikos