From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 12:09:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854B016A41F for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 12:09:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E472B43D49 for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 12:09:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (212.181.162.201) by pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.059.6) id 4291940100167D32 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 14:09:48 +0200 Received: (qmail 47055 invoked by uid 1001); 29 May 2005 14:09:46 +0200 Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 14:09:46 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050529120946.GA47043@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt , Ulf Magnusson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050529134323.L20141@maren.thelosingend.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050529134323.L20141@maren.thelosingend.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Ulf Magnusson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:09:50 -0000 On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 01:49:21PM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > > * Ted Mittelstaedt [2005-05-29 00:05 -0700] > > Wrong. Each IDE cable can have 2 devices a master and a slave. So if > > you have 2 IDE controllers you can have master, slave, master, slave > > for a total of 4 drives. > > > > It is not master on ide cable 1, slave on ide cable 2. > > > There's nothing wrong with having a primary master and a secondary slave, > just as much as there is nothing wrong with the setup you proposes. Although it is theoretically fine to have just a slave device on an IDE channel without a master device, that configuration fails to work in many cases. If it fails to work it is probably a bug in some component of the system, but that doesn't help the person having the problem. If you have just a single IDE device on an IDE channel it should be configured as master, not as slave. Having it configured as slave is supposed to work, but often does not work and is therefore not recommended. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se