Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:30:02 +0000 From: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>, Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> Cc: sthaug <sthaug@nethelp.no>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE Message-ID: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D6568B9094CED@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <be2235c1-1550-4a5e-be2f-e31379b08da1@www.fastmail.com> References: <cb8f9df8-4a97-4823-bbcd-560a95e9df19@www.fastmail.com> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D6568B90935EC@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <e93467c5-d6bd-4db0-b4a4-a382adad7289@www.fastmail.com> <20200322.214355.415142200.sthaug@nethelp.no> <bd63a50a-5a1e-404a-bbf4-f8c795d369d6@www.fastmail.com> <20200322230339.GB5808@in-addr.com> <8141b371-5cdf-4f82-8959-5fa1071aa6dd@www.fastmail.com> <be2235c1-1550-4a5e-be2f-e31379b08da1@www.fastmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You cannot force speed with ix, only force autoneg. You need to use the adv=
ertise_speed sysctl for this:
sysctl -d dev.ix.0.advertise_speed
dev.ix.0.advertise_speed:
Control advertised link speed using these flags:
0x1 - advertise 100M
0x2 - advertise 1G
0x4 - advertise 10G
0x8 - advertise 10M
100M and 10M are only supported on certain adapters.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:23 PM
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org>
Cc: sthaug <sthaug@nethelp.no>; Pieper, Jeffrey E <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.c=
om>; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:24 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:11:20PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 4:43 PM, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > > > Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. =20
> > > > > It warns me when the optic is installed:
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (R) Network Connec=
tions are quality tested using Intel (R) Ethernet Optics. Using untested mo=
dules is not supported and may cause unstable operation or damage to the mo=
dule or the adapter. Intel Corporation is not responsible for any harm caus=
ed by using untested modules.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > I cannot use an SFP+ optic at the switch. The connection just do=
es not happen.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > If I go back to the original SFP optic, the connection occurs, as=
expected at 1G.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > On the switch side, I've tried a known good optic from an existin=
g connection.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > I could install an PRO/10GbE instead, that has a built-in=20
> > > > > transceiver. I have two of those in use now, both working on 10G.
> > > >=20
> > > > Have you tried connected it to something other than the Unifi switc=
h?
> > >=20
> > > The only SFP+ capable switches I have are Unifi.
> > >=20
> > > I just tried the other switch (US-48) which had one SFP+ port free. =
Same issues there.
> >=20
> > Did the Unifi switch see the SFP+ optics on the switch end?
>=20
> That port never lit up on the switch. I didn't check anything else,=20
> switch-related.
I just inserted a 10G transceiver into port 8. It shows up as a 10GBase-SR
Screen shots at https://imgur.com/a/SSEgyxN
At the same time, on the server side, ifconfig indicates:
status: no carrier
supported media:
media autoselect
media 10Gbase-SR
nd6 options=3D23<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
plugged: SFP/SFP+/SFP28 10G Base-SR (LC)
vendor: AVAGO PN: AFBR-703SDZ SN: AD0946A00YB DATE: 2009-11-10
module temperature: 36.75 C Voltage: 3.32 Volts
RX: 0.67 mW (-1.72 dBm) TX: 0.56 mW (-2.46 dBm)
I have not yet tried moving from auto-negotiate on both ends.
--
Dan Langille
dan@langille.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D6568B9094CED>