From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 12 15:14:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A1616A402 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACEE43D45 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so1057390wxc for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:13:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M7nCMExod1VLxTbgGkNTICTTqYdHLVdzh8C6TjPDKB/CUajAKOXAcJZlFNmQVQpdgu+91/WltHSvVQKJ+RBGxIGXwEonFbZGBkVbWgXo15VStjqi1Ud1+dgoIvPgMGVRfBMfG9KPrKjc2SjyRWccjRATsRxazO9oYBPhH2zX9Go= Received: by 10.70.28.9 with SMTP id b9mr848732wxb; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.75.7 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80f4f2b20604120813k57abb16avd690756dfd0d93b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:13:54 -0400 From: "Jim Stapleton" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <443D170C.3080103@utdallas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <443BB35B.6050801@computer.org> <20060411204721.S35382@tripel.monochrome.org> <443C59BF.60901@computer.org> <200604121137.32229.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> <443D170C.3080103@utdallas.edu> Subject: Re: Wanted: Flash player for .... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:14:11 -0000 > I'm not a lawyer either, but frankly I think their EULA is unenforceable > and their attitude ought to cost them customers. This isn't the most abusive thing they've done to date, not even close, and people still use their software (unfortunately), I doubt it'll change much... Overall, their platform concepts aren't excessively bad (for the most part), but as far as the implementation goes, I'd rather stick to something 3rd party...