Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:02:55 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: g_part partition tool -- some logistic questions Message-ID: <AEDF2785-31DB-46A8-ACE3-2A18907CA8DA@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <17224.1171144497@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <17224.1171144497@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 10, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <5BB89CF0-69CE-4A93-828B-298A13CD0F67@mac.com>, Marcel > Moolenaar wri > tes: >> I'm writing a partitioning tool, I'm working on the >> geom that's being partitioned. In an ideal world all >> partitioning schemes are handled by g_part, which >> means I can look for the g_part class and have them >> all, but for now I need to hardcode the numerous >> classes. > > If you're working from the XML, consider having the > classes announce themselves to you in XML ? That's a good idea. I think I'll do that. Thanks, -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AEDF2785-31DB-46A8-ACE3-2A18907CA8DA>