From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 12:28:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3301065673 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [78.111.72.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB0258FC13 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:28:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83856 invoked by uid 80); 4 Mar 2011 12:28:25 -0000 Received: from 164.139.7.12 ([164.139.7.12]) by avocado.salatschuessel.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:28:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20110304132825.69583zfq7lvftuio@avocado.salatschuessel.net> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:28:25 +0100 From: Oliver Lehmann To: Boris Samorodov References: <201103041043.p24AhwQ8023264@repoman.freebsd.org> <28478789@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20110304130842.119715ssjn44nps8@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <58879204@h30.sp.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <58879204@h30.sp.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.9) / FreeBSD-7.3 Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/wmauda Makefile ports/audio/xmp Makefile ports/audio/mp3splt-gtk Makefile ports/audio/audacious-dumb Makefile ports/multimedia/tunapie Makefile ports/multimedia/xfce4-xmms-plugin Makefile ports/sysutils/conky ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:28:27 -0000 Hi Boris, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:08:42 +0100 Oliver Lehmann wrote: >> Boris Samorodov wrote: >> > >> > Was PORTREVISION bump really needed for those ports? > >> They have a hard or optional dependency to audacious so in my opinion - yes. > > I'm not sure what you do mean. What's the "hard" and "optional" > dependency? And what changed at the main port that those dependent > ports in your opinion should be bumped? With hard I mean the port is depending on audacious with no option to disable that. With optional I mean you could disable the audacious dependency via a make switch. The main port itself changed so it is advised to recompile the depending ports as otherwise the depending ports would have still the old version of audacious recorded as a dependency but this old version is no longer installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.