From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 19:00:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4204C1065675 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4718FC1A for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvbEm-0007bZ-TM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:00:00 +0100 Received: from pool-70-21-1-228.res.east.verizon.net ([70.21.1.228]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:00:00 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-70-21-1-228.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:00:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:59:23 -0400 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <201003271906.24857.tijl@coosemans.org> <4BAE4E4A.4000002@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-21-1-228.res.east.verizon.net Subject: Re: Enough Is Enough X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:00:03 -0000 Programmer In Training wrote: [snip] > > When jpeg-x (not a typo) is built, the port needs to be automatically > looking forward to see what all depends on it (and if anything depends > on that) and possibly asking the user if they want to upgrade all those > programs to ensure they link to the proper version of jpeg at all times. > Or they could all statically compile in jpeg support (as I assume FF > does because I can still see jpegs in the file upload preview pane) so > this is never an issue at all. I am currently able to manipulate any > jpeg at all (and now unable to use an increasing number of apps) which > is crippling my ability to edit images for any use. > So man portupgrade and see what the -r and -R switches do. -Mike