From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 23 00:42:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AD40616A4DC; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:42:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 53F2343D1D; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:42:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	j3N0gcka017341;	Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:42:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:42:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <426985CA.30003@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0504222039430.26084-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net)
cc: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
cc: peter@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libpthread version bump
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:42:40 -0000

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, David Xu wrote:
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >>>
> >>I worked up a quick patch.  It compiles, but it will be some time
> >>before I can try it.
> >>
> >>  http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/kse/libpthread.diffs
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Note that I also slightly prefer #2, since you would have to make
> >the #pragma weak hacks to both libpthread and libthr.
> >
>
> I won't support LDT based TLS,  so you don't have to patch it.

If there are applications linked to libthr and libc.so.5 (in 5.x)
you have the same problem.  If you aren't going to support LDT,
then you should bump the library version (unless we do #2).

-- 
DE