From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 18:13:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C1316A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:13:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lazir.toya.net.pl (lazir.toya.net.pl [217.113.224.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39AD43D64 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:13:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imachine@toya.net.pl) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.120.26]) by lazir.toya.net.pl (TOYAnet MailServer) with ESMTP id 09A0D8BD9C; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:13:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from lazir.toya.net.pl ([192.168.120.25]) by localhost (agregat [192.168.120.26]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12515-03; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:13:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [85.89.161.206] (unknown [85.89.161.206]) by lazir.toya.net.pl (TOYAnet MailServer) with ESMTP id 1B5638BD2B; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:13:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <422753C7.3000604@toya.net.pl> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 19:13:27 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Mateusz_J=EAdrasik?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050227) X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel O'Connor , stable@freebsd.org References: <4225FE0B.1000604@toya.net.pl> <200503031043.52675.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200503031043.52675.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TOYA-AV: AntyVir-Skaner at toya.net.pl Subject: Re: ueagle(4) driver merging X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:13:18 -0000 Daniel O'Connor napisał(a): > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:25, Mateusz Jędrasik wrote: > >>Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem >>code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? > > > umodem is for serial modems not ADSL. I believe ADSL modems tend to send > either ATM or ethernet frames whereas umodem deals with RS232 like devices. > Indeed, then, is the driver going to be merged in its original form or not? :) Anyone? ;) Cheers, -- Mateusz Jędrasik