From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Jul 19 08:15:27 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352E710500A2 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D3983FFC for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 61B5B10500A0; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A137105009E for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23A483FF8 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A2B157A3 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6J8FOB6037651 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w6J8FOvf037650 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229885] benchmarks/stress-ng isn't broken on i386, something else is. Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pizzamig@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229885 Bug ID: 229885 Summary: benchmarks/stress-ng isn't broken on i386, something else is. Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: i386 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: pizzamig@freebsd.org Reporter: dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au Assignee: pizzamig@freebsd.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(pizzamig@freebsd.org) I last built stress-ng-0.09.27.txz on i386 on 30th May on a FreeBSD 11.1Sta= ble which was built around late April.=20=20 After upgrading to latest 11.2Stable with clang 6.0.1 and rebuilding stress= -ng 0.09.33 I obtain lots of messages like stress-atomic.c:(.text+0x467): undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_sub_8' which is why the maintainer marked this port as broken in the Makefile. So I went hunting, as I'm experiencing quite a few other ports problems. I switched into a revert/build cycle and attempted to rebuild back to 0.09.23= .=20 All experienced the same failure. So... the problem isn't with stress-ng. I've found that its quickest to simply force the build with gcc7, which in = this case easily rebuilt stress-ng 0.09.23 AND stress-ng-0.09.33. I suspect clang 6.0.X so I need to revert clang from 6.0.1 back to 5.0.0; b= ut without reverting the buildworld as it would be preferable to establish that other libraries (or the kernel) weren't the issue. But how? stress-ng 0.09.33 built and ran cleanly on amd64 under clang 6.0.1 Aside and incidentally, other ports that I had to modify build attributes f= or=20 were: textproc/htdig sysutils/npadmin net/isc-dhcp44-* on both i386 & amd64= .=20 security/openssh-portable has only had a flavored enhancement but building = has proven intractable in our environ, we enable one option BSM... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=