From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 24 05:59:38 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73861D7E
 for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 05:59:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from davide.damico@contactlab.com)
Received: from mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it
 (mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it [93.94.37.7])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E211F0
 for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 05:59:37 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=contactlab.it; s=clab1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 q=dns/txt; i=@contactlab.it; t=1364104769;
 h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
 bh=Fm+F89Z1tKyg49zwoROaV7rJoghmBeH6VIwx0R/ICdI=;
 b=gnwh7JwPKChxztXI60rvbe79vGQXm1P40im5ykvHVPPgVk4BeIJQpgpy6/nMpKaF
 I9JNk5sdoRVFdtq8MeJ3dseU/bkF3LqBOpa9LdLso8VPID+E+FK9hYcZiyyx0ZmU
 l2VSaNnxCt1VmLkb/P5OIe/nMrMi5oU2mxH3tUvAThI=;
Received: from [213.92.90.12] ([213.92.90.12:35527] helo=mail3.tomato.it)
 by t.contactlab.it (envelope-from <davide.damico@contactlab.com>)
 (ecelerity 3.5.1.37854 r(Momo-dev:3.5.1.0)) with ESMTP
 id F0/90-24145-1469E415; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:59:29 +0100
Received: from mx3-master.housing.tomato.lan ([172.16.7.55])
 by mail3.tomato.it with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <davide.damico@contactlab.com>) id 1UJdxp-0004jo-AZ
 for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:59:29 +0100
Received: (qmail 18213 invoked by uid 80); 24 Mar 2013 05:59:29 -0000
To: <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
X-PHP-Script: uebmeil.sys.tomatointeractive.it/index.php for 172.16.16.228
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:main.inc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:59:29 +0100
From: Davide D'Amico <davide.damico@contactlab.com>
Organization: ContactLab
Mail-Reply-To: <davide.damico@contactlab.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF3xD3nDDUYB94TS9AUUQ=CPztB1S8mU4fRwNB5GupmK8MgwXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <514C1E5F.8040504@contactlab.com>
 <CAF3xD3nDDUYB94TS9AUUQ=CPztB1S8mU4fRwNB5GupmK8MgwXg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <142597a8659b43db8665aa1f055d2ff1@sys.tomatointeractive.it>
X-Sender: davide.damico@contactlab.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.5
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: davide.damico@contactlab.com
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-performance>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 05:59:38 -0000

Il 22.03.2013 16:56 Евгений Хоркин ha scritto:
> Hi Davide!

Sorry if I do a reply 'here' but some posts where filtered by antispam.

To Daniel Bilik: yes, I used the 'complex' OLTP tests, because more 
similar to my production dataset/workload.

I'll try the 'simple' dataset, but do you think I have some chance to 
"solve" the issue?

Thanks,
d.