From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 4 00:43:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3251816A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:43:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM (citadel.nobulus.com [212.97.207.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC48B43FD7 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:43:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iva@orange.dk) Received: from CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA48hEu5053275 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:43:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iva@CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM) Received: (from iva@localhost) by CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hA48hEgD053274 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:43:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iva) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:43:14 +0100 From: Ilya Varlashkin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031104084314.GA53171@CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM> References: <20031104000519.GA31319@mail.unixjunkie.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031104000519.GA31319@mail.unixjunkie.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Scanned-By: CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM Subject: Re: (long) high traffic syslog server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 08:43:24 -0000 On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:05:33PM -0600, John wrote: > I though maybe syslogd was the problem, but running nc on the syslog port and > sending output to /dev/null still shows the buffer problem. This looks like the system isn't processing interrupts from network card fast enough. Try running 'systat -vm' and see if '%Intr' is high. I'm not familiar with particular network card you're using, but try to check if with some Intel 100Mbps card you get better performance. If your syslog traffic load is always high, it doesn't matter how large buffers you make - at some point they will be filled up if system can't cope with such amount of traffic. Kind regards, Ilya Varlashkin